Property: Approximately 4,200 sq ft small-to-mid commercial tenant space along I-93 access corridor, Salem NH
Tenant: N.C. (business owner alias — small commercial tenant, HVAC scope entirely tenant-funded)
Scope: Complete tenant improvement HVAC installation replacing existing shared-building rooftop unit allocation for professional/small commercial business (small marketing/design agency); 4-zone Mitsubishi CITY MULTI VRF configuration; NH regulatory framework coordination
Timeline: Diagnostic and design 3 weeks, installation 6 days coordinated with tenant operational schedule
Investment: $32,600 installed, $3,500 NH Saves Commercial rebate, $5,000 estimated IRA 179D commercial building deduction, net $24,100
N.C. leases approximately 4,200 sq ft commercial tenant space in a multi-tenant commercial building along the I-93 access corridor in Salem NH. The I-93 corridor through Salem NH hosts substantial commercial development including small-to-mid multi-tenant commercial buildings, standalone commercial properties, and small industrial/professional services buildings drawing on the I-93 access convenience for southern New Hampshire and northern Boston metropolitan area business connections.
N.C.’s commercial building context differs from the Rockingham Park redevelopment area (see Rockingham Park case study for comparison): the I-93 corridor commercial buildings tend to be smaller-scale, older construction (1990s-2000s vs Rockingham Park’s 2019+ new construction), and typically operate on shared-building HVAC configurations similar to the Ward Hill Business Park Haverhill commercial building context. N.C.’s specific tenant space is one of 6 tenant suites in the commercial building, with shared-building HVAC infrastructure providing baseline heating and cooling.
N.C.’s business (small marketing/design agency with approximately 8 employees) requires reliable HVAC for consistent workspace comfort and client meetings hosted at the office. The shared-building HVAC infrastructure showed declining reliability with recurring comfort challenges reported by N.C. and multiple other tenants in the building. N.C. considered several options: (1) remain with the shared-building HVAC infrastructure and pursue building owner accountability for the shared system; (2) install dedicated tenant HVAC scope providing independent zone control while shared building HVAC continues to operate for other tenants; (3) negotiate with landlord for coordinated shared-building HVAC replacement (potentially through building-wide TI allowance scope).
N.C. selected option 2 (dedicated tenant HVAC scope) — the shared-building HVAC continues to operate for other tenants who have not yet transitioned to dedicated tenant scope, and N.C.’s specific tenant space is isolated from the shared-building HVAC delivery through the installation. This approach provides N.C. with independent comfort control without requiring building-wide coordination or landlord authorization for building-wide replacement scope.
N.C. requested Rivic assess installation options with priorities: (1) dedicated tenant HVAC providing independent zone control across the small commercial space’s use areas (reception, conference, open workspace, private office, kitchen/break), (2) shared-building HVAC isolation coordination for N.C.’s tenant space specifically, (3) NH regulatory framework coordination applied to commercial tenant scope, (4) NH Saves Commercial rebate coordination for eligible scope.
Andrew Samples conducted the initial diagnostic assessment during scheduled after-hours evening visit. Ryan Sullivan handled commercial VRF configuration specification. Kathleen Brennan coordinated landlord authorization for dedicated tenant HVAC scope and NH regulatory framework coordination.
Key findings: (1) shared-building HVAC infrastructure connects to N.C.’s tenant space through ceiling ductwork with per-suite thermostat control — isolation of N.C.’s tenant space feasible through ductwork disconnection and separate distribution installation, (2) 400A per-tenant electric service adequate for tenant VRF installation with capacity margin, (3) rooftop area available for outdoor condenser placement per landlord approval (obtained through Kathleen’s coordination), (4) tenant space configuration favors 4-zone VRF configuration matching the small commercial use areas, (5) shared-building HVAC continues to operate for other 5 tenant suites; N.C.’s tenant space isolation does not impact other tenants.
ACCA Manual J commercial load calculation determined tenant space cooling load at 88°F summer design of approximately 42,000 BTU/hr and heating load at 4°F winter design of approximately 32,000 BTU/hr.
Rivic recommended Mitsubishi CITY MULTI VRF 4-zone configuration matched to tenant space configuration: (1) reception/waiting area 12,000 BTU/hr concealed ceiling cassette, (2) conference room 12,000 BTU/hr concealed ceiling cassette (variable occupancy 2-8 meeting attendees), (3) open-plan workspace with private office 18,000 BTU/hr concealed ceiling cassette (consistent 6-8 staff plus principal office), (4) kitchen/break area 9,000 BTU/hr concealed ceiling cassette (variable occupancy plus cooking heat load). Total outdoor unit capacity 60,000 BTU/hr matched to Manual J loads.
Rooftop outdoor condenser placement: landlord-approved location following building’s other tenant condenser placement patterns. Refrigerant line-set routing through tenant space ceiling chase.
Shared-building HVAC isolation: ceiling ductwork connections to shared-building HVAC disconnected at tenant space boundary; supply and return grilles from shared-building infrastructure sealed. Shared-building HVAC continues to operate for other 5 tenant suites without impact.
The shared-building HVAC isolation scope is a specific coordination consideration for tenant installations in multi-tenant buildings where other tenants remain on shared infrastructure. Kathleen Brennan coordinated:
Installation completed over 6 days coordinated with N.C.’s tenant operational schedule (installation during evenings and weekend with limited weekday operational impact). Post-installation operational verification: dedicated 4-zone VRF configuration delivers substantially improved zone control compared to shared-building HVAC baseline. N.C. reported particular satisfaction with the independent zone control and elimination of shared-system reliability concerns.
Post-installation first-year utility monitoring: total electric operating cost approximately $4,800 for combined heating and cooling on N.C.’s dedicated tenant HVAC. Previous shared-building HVAC allocation to N.C. approximately $6,400/year through building operating expense pass-through. Combined operating cost benefit approximately $1,600/year including both reduced tenant HVAC operating cost and reduced building operating expense allocation.
Salem NH I-93 corridor and other Salem NH small commercial tenant HVAC service including dedicated tenant HVAC installation with shared-building HVAC isolation coordination, multi-zone commercial VRF configuration for small commercial use cases, landlord authorization coordination for dedicated tenant scope, shared-building HVAC service contractor coordination, tenant operational schedule accommodation for installation, NH regulatory framework coordination, NH Saves Commercial rebate coordination, and IRA 179D commercial building deduction coordination all route through our 225 Broadway #306 office in downtown Methuen (8-20 minute drive to Salem NH from Broadway). This case study represents a specific installation completed for N.C.; individual tenant assessments determine equipment specification and installation scope.